MILITARY TRIBUNALS
While everyone was once again distracted and not paying attention, our President was finishing up a few more things in preparation for what is to come. The ides of March are upon us.  – John Miranda [b]

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473 of April 13, 1984, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Part II, Part III, and Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, are amended as described in Annex 1, which is attached to and made a part of this order.

Sec. 2.  The amendments in Annex 1 shall take effect on the date of this order, subject to the following:

  • (a)  Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.
  • (b)  Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate the prosecution of any offense committed before the date of this order.  The maximum punishment for an offense committed before the date of this order shall not exceed the maximum punishment in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.
  • (c)  Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate any non-judicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the date of this order, and any such nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action shall proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if the amendments in Annex 1 had not been prescribed.

Sec. 3.

  • (a)  Pursuant to section 5542 of the Military
    Justice Act of 2016 (MJA), division E of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, Public Law 114-328, 130 Stat. 2000, 2967 (2016), except as otherwise provided by the MJA or this order, the MJA shall take effect on January 1, 2019.
  • (b)  Nothing in the MJA shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to January 1, 2019, that was not punishable when done or omitted.
  • (c)  Nothing in title LX of the MJA shall be construed to invalidate the prosecution of any offense committed before January 1, 2019.  The maximum punishment for an offense committed before January 1, 2019, shall not exceed the maximum punishment in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.
  • (d)  Nothing in the MJA shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to January 1, 2019.  Except as otherwise provided in this order, the MJA shall not apply in any case in which charges are referred to trial by court-martial before January 1, 2019.  Except as otherwise provided in this order, proceedings in any such case shall be held in the same manner and with the same effect as if the MJA had not been enacted.

Sec. 4.  The Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, as amended by section 1 of this order, is amended as described in Annex 2, which is attached to and made a part of this order.

Sec. 5.  The amendments in Annex 2, including Appendix 12A, shall take effect on January 1, 2019, subject to the following:

  • (a)  Nothing in Annex 2 shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to January 1, 2019, that was not punishable when done or omitted.
  • (b)  Nothing in section 4 of Annex 2 shall be construed to invalidate the prosecution of any offense committed before January 1, 2019.  The maximum punishment for an offense committed before January 1, 2019, shall not exceed the maximum punishment in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.
  • (c)  Nothing in Annex 2 shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to January 1, 2019.  Except as otherwise provided in this order, the amendments in Annex 2 shall not apply in any case in which charges are referred to trial by court-martial before January 1, 2019.  Except as otherwise provided in this order, proceedings in any such case shall be held in the same manner and with the same effect as if such amendments had not been prescribed.

Sec. 6.

  • (a)  The amendments to Articles 2, 56(d), 58a, and 63 of the UCMJ enacted by sections 5102, 5301, 5303, and 5327 of the MJA apply only to cases in which all specifications allege offenses committed on or after January 1, 2019.
  • (b)  If the accused is found guilty of a specification alleging the commission of one or more offenses before January 1, 2019, Article 60 of the UCMJ, as in effect on the date of the earliest offense of which the accused was found guilty, shall apply to the convening authority, in addition to the suspending authority in Article 60a(c) as enacted by the MJA, to the extent that Article 60:
    • (1)  requires action by the convening authority on the sentence;
    • (2)  permits action by the convening authority on findings;
    • (3)  authorizes the convening authority to modify the findings and sentence of a court-martial, dismiss any charge or specification by setting aside a finding of guilty thereto, or change a finding of guilty to a charge or specification to a finding of guilty to an offense that is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in the charge or specification;
    • (4)  authorizes the convening authority to order a proceeding in revision or a rehearing; or
    • (5)  authorizes the convening authority to approve, disapprove, commute, or suspend a sentence in whole or in part.

Sec. 7.  The amendment to Article 15 of the UCMJ enacted by section 5141 of the MJA shall apply to any nonjudicial punishment imposed on or after January 1, 2019.

Sec. 8.  The amendments to Articles 32 and 34 of the UCM enacted by sections 5203 and 5205 of the MJA apply with respect to preliminary hearings conducted and advice given on or after January 1, 2019.

Sec. 9.  The amendments to Article 79 of the UCMJ enacted by section 5402 of the MJA and the amendments to Appendix 12A to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, made by this order apply only to offenses committed on or after January 1, 2019.

Sec. 10.  Except as provided by Rule for Courts-Martial 902A, as promulgated by Annex 2, any change to sentencing procedures:

  • (a)  made by Articles 16(c)(2), 19(b), 25(d)(2) and (3), 39(a)(4), 53, 53a, or 56(c) of the UCMJ, as enacted by sections 5161, 5163, 5182, 5222, 5236, 5237, and 5301 of the MJA; or
  • (b)  included in Annex 2 in rules implementing those articles, applies only to cases in which all specifications allege offenses committed on or after January 1, 2019.

Sec. 11.  The amendments to Article 146 of the UCMJ enacted by section 5521 of the MJA and the new Article 146a enacted by section 5522 of the MJA shall take effect on the day after the report for fiscal year 2017 required by Article 146(c) of the UCMJ (as in effect before the MJA’s amendments) is submitted in accordance with Article 146(c)(1), but in no event later than December 1, 2018.

Sec. 12.  In accordance with Article 33 of the UCMJ, as amended by section 5204 of the MJA, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will issue nonbinding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to the disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under Articles 30 and 34 of the UCMJ. That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

March 1, 2018. [1]

Executive Order 13823 of 30-Jan-2018.pdf [2]

Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption 2017-12-21.pdf [3]

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.

I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

I hereby determine and order:

Section 1.

  • (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:
    • (i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;
    • (ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:
      • (A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
      • (B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
        • (1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
        • (2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;
      • (C) to be or have been a leader or official of:
        • (1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or
        • (2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or
      • (D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and
    • (iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:
      • (A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:
        • (1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;
        • (2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
        • (3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;
      • (B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
      • (C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section.
  • (b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.

Sec. 2. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1 of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:

  • (a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and
  • (b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 5.

  • (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
  • (b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

  • (a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;
  • (b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and
  • (c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA and the Act as may be necessary to implement this order and section 1263(a) of the Act with respect to the determinations provided for therein. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, re-delegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 9. The Secretary of State is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, the INA, and the Act as may be necessary to carry out section 2 of this order and, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the reporting requirement in section 1264(a) of the Act with respect to the reports provided for in section 1264(b)(2) of that Act. The Secretary of State may, consistent with applicable law, re-delegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 10. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to determine that circumstances no longer warrant the blocking of the property and interests in property of a person listed in the Annex to this order, and to take necessary action to give effect to that determination.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 12. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, December 21, 2017.

Sec. 13. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,

December 20, 2017.

US President Donald Trump signs Executive Order

Original Annex 1 Document

To continue reading Annex 1 go to [4]

It sounds like they’re getting all their ducks in a row to prepare for military courts to deal with the deep state operators.  Treason is still punishable by death (hanging or firing squad) under military tribunal; a whole different set of rules than US civil courts.

Civilians Can be Arrested by the Military and Tried by Military Tribunal During Martial Law

To continue reading Persons Who Can Be Tried By Court Martial go to [5]

Trump, fond of executive orders, awaits more fancy pens ...

Here is the section on 30a. Article 106a—Espionage

a. Text of statute.

(a)

  • (1) Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage  of  a  foreign  nation, communicates, delivers, or transmits, or attempts to communicate, deliver, or transmit, to any entity described in paragraph (2), either directly or indirectly, anything described in paragraph (3) shall be punished as a court-martial may direct, except that if the accused is found guilty of an offense that directly concerns
    • (A) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale attack,
    • (B) war plans,
    • (C) communications intelligence or cryptographic information, or
    • (D) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy, the accused shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
  • (2) An entity referred to in paragraph (1) is—
    • (A) a foreign government;
    • (B) a faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States; or
    • ( C )are presentative , officer , agent , employee, subject, or citizen of such a government, faction, party, or force.
  • (3) A thing referred to in paragraph (1) is a document , writing, codebook, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, note, instrument, appliance , or information relating to the national defense.

(b)

  • (1) No person may be sentenced by court- martial to suffer death for an offense under this section (article) unless—
    • ( A ) the members of the court-martial unanimously find at least one of the aggravating factors set out in subsection (c); and
    • ( B ) the members unanimously determine that any extenuating or mitigating circumstances are substantially outweighed by any aggravating circumstances, including the aggravating factors set out under subsection (c).
  • ( 2 ) Findings under this subsection may be based on—
    • (A) evidence introduced on the issue of guilt or innocence;
    • (B) evidence introduced during the sentencing proceeding; or
    • (C) all such evidence.
  • (3) The accused shall be given broad latitude to present matters in extenuation and mitigation.

(c) A sentence of death may be adjudged by a court-martial for an offense under this section (article) only if the members unanimously find, beyond a reasonable doubt, one or more of the following aggravating factors:

  • (1) The accused has been convicted of an- other offense involving espionage or treason for which either a sentence of death or imprisonment for life was authorized by statute.
  • (2) In the commission of the offense, the accused knowingly created a grave risk of substantial damage to the national security.
  • (3) In the commission of the offense, the accused knowingly created a grave risk of death to another person.
  • (4) Any other factor that may be prescribed IV-44 ¶30.c.(6)(c) Article 106a by the President by regulations under section 836 of this title (Article 36).

b. Elements.

  • (1) Espionage.
    • (a) That the accused communicated, delivered, or transmitted any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, note, instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense;
    • ( b ) That this matter was communicated , delivered, or transmitted to any foreign government, or to any faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States, or to any representative, officer, agent, employee, subject or citizen thereof, either directly or indirectly; and
    • ( c ) That the accused did so with intent or reason to believe that such matter would be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation.
  • (2) Attempted espionage.
    • (a) That the accused did a certain overt act;
    • (b) That the act was done with the intent to commit the offense of espionage;
    • (c) That the act amounted to more than mere preparation; and
    • ( d ) That the act apparently tended to bring about the offense of espionage.
  • (3) Espionage as a capital offense.
    • (a) That the accused committed espionage or attempted espionage; and
    • (b) That the offense directly concerned
      • (1) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale attack,
      • (2) war plans,
      • (3) communications intelligence or cryptographic in- formation, or
      • (4) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy.

c. Explanation.

  • (1) Intent.
    • “Intent or reason to believe” that the information “is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation ” means that the accused acted in bad faith and without lawful authority with respect to information that is not lawfully accessible to the public.
  • ( 2 ) National defense information.
    • “ Instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense” includes the full range of modern technology and matter that may be developed in the future, including chemical or biological agents, computer technology, and other matter related to the national defense.
  • (3) Espionage as a capital offense.
    • Capital punishment is authorized if the government alleges and proves that the offense directly concerned
      • (1) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale attack,
      • (2) war plans,
      • (3) communications intelligence or cryptographic in- formation, or
      • (4) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy.

See R.C.M. 1004 concerning sentencing proceedings in capital cases.

d. Lesser included offenses.

See paragraph 3 of this part and Appendix 12A.

e. Maximum punishment.

  • (1) Espionage as a capital offense.
    Death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
    See R.C.M. 1003.
  • (2) Espionage or attempted espionage.
    Any punishment, other than death, that a court-martial may direct. See R.C.M. 1003.

Article 103 on SPIES is particularly interesting.

31. Article 103 (10 U.S.C. 903)—Spies

a. Text of statute. Any person who in time of war is found lurking as a spy or acting as a spy in or about any place, vessel, or aircraft, within the control or jurisdiction of any of the armed forces, or in or about any shipyard, any manufacturing or industrial plant, or any other place or institution engaged in work in aid of the prosecution of the war by the United States, or elsewhere, shall be tried by a general court-martial or by a military commission and on conviction shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial or a military commission may direct. This section does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A of this title.

b. Elements.

  • (1) That the accused was found in, about, or in and about a certain place, vessel, or aircraft within the control or jurisdiction of an armed force of the United States, or a shipyard, manufacturing or industrial plant, or other place or institution engaged in work in aid of the prosecution of the war by the United States, or elsewhere;
  • (2) That the accused was lurking, acting clandestinely or under false pretenses;
  • (3) That the accused was collecting or attempting to collect certain information;
  • (4) That the accused did so with the intent to convey this information to the enemy; and
  • (5) That this was done in time of war.

c. Explanation.

  • (1) In time of war. See R.C.M. 103(19).
  • (2) Enemy. For a discussion of “enemy,” see subparagraph 27.c.(1)(b).
  • (3) Scope of offense. The words “any person” bring within the jurisdiction of general courtsmartial and military commissions all persons of whatever nationality or status who commit spying.
  • (4) Nature of offense. A person can be a spy only when, acting clandestinely or under false pretenses, that person obtains or seeks to obtain information with the intent to convey it to a hostile party. It is not essential that the accused obtain the information sought or that it be communicated. The offense is complete with lurking or acting clandestinely or under false pretenses with intent to accomplish these objects.
  • (5) Intent. It is necessary to prove an intent to convey information to the enemy. This intent may be inferred from evidence of a deceptive insinuation of the accused among our forces, but evidence that the person had come within the lines for a comparatively innocent purpose, as to visit family or to reach friendly lines by assuming a disguise, is admissible to rebut this inference.
  • (6) Persons not included under “spying.”
    • (a) Members of a military organization not wearing a disguise, dispatch drivers, whether members of a military organization or civilians, and persons in ships or aircraft who carry out …

[6]

MS-13 (a.k.a. MARA SALVATRUCHA ), El Salvador; Mexico ; Honduras; Guatemala; United States [TCO]
[TCO]: Transnational Criminal Organizations Executive Order 13581;
OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List Update 27th of Feb. 2018 [7]

“ZIO” (a.k.a. ZAGARIA, Michel e; a.k.a. “CAPASTORTA”; a.k.a. “CAPOSTORTA”; a.k.a. “ISS”; a.k.a. “MANERA”); DOB 21 May 1958; POB San Cipriano d’Aversa, Italy (individual ) [TCO].

Beginning of “Suicide Weekend” folks. Nunes letter response due 3/2-3/4 as well as the Houston craigslist crisis actor report dates

 

In an nutshell: if you are part of the deepstate aka the illuminati aka the cabal aka the swamp… you are done! You have two options commit suicide or death in gitmo. Choose now, or don’t.  JP

Hillary Clinton? Obama? What happens to people who SELLOUT their country for money & power?

What is a traitor? What is sedition?

ADN Related Articles:

Treason Defined: What is a Military Tribunal

Hezbollah & the Iran Deal : is Trump Lining Obama Up for Charges of Treason?

UraniumOne: Obama and Clinton’s Reset Fraud and Treason?

GITMO: Open for Business for those Threats both Foreign and Domestic

DEEP STATE CRIMINALITY WARRANTS RICO ACT PROSECUTION AND PUNISHMENT

Sources:

[1] WhiteHouse.gov

[2] EO 18323

[3] EO Dec 20, 2017

[4] CCFLOG – Annex 1

[5] Duke Univ

[6] Defense.gov

[7] Office of Foreign Asset Control

Add’l resources

[a] Reddit 

[b] John Miranda  John Miranda II